Rob Adams a Painter's Blog painter's progress

October 30, 2013

Spirituality and Art

No not a post about religion, you can relax! A post prompted by two things, one Grayson Perry’s Reith lectures on the art world and discussions on an on line forum about drawing. They both caused me to think about how artists think about themselves. There is I have come to think a disconnect between what artists would like to believe they are and what they actually seem to be.
On the forum discussion (about drawing) I suggested that drawing was a craft, like making shoes or chairs. This drew howls of protest from the public gallery. No it seems drawing was a way of channelling your soul on to paper, a meditation on the possibilities of the infinite, anything, anything but craft! I tried logical argument (or so I thought) but to no avail, I was asked why I was demeaning drawing.
It occurred to me that drawing had been promoted while I wasn’t paying attention to the purest form of prayer, the Lords prayer of artistic spiritual communing. People who know me will not be surprised that the appearance of a sacred cow will always prompt me to ask awkward questions.
In the spirit (if I may use the term) of research I looked at a selection of well known artists CV’s Emin etc. A high proportion stressed how drawing was very important to their process. I did consider posting some of their efforts and I really did try and find evidence of skill, but truly there was none. If any of them had shown up at Rubens’ door seeking a job they would have been out of luck. Below is the prospectus for a life drawing class at St Martins.

“Over the course of a week you will be encouraged to lose your inhibitions though a wide variety of practices and materials. You will be asked to confront your own ambitions within your artistic practice and to consider how to make your work relevant to yourself and to contemporary artistic practices in the wider sense.

During each session you will be introduced to a new approach to thinking and making. We will look at the work of living artists and explore relevant themes and practices. Some workshops will make use of sound or involve a live performer such as an actor or dancer. You will be encouraged to engage with new concepts and practices and to try a wide variety of differing materials – some traditional, others less so.

You will be encouraged to work with the skills that you already possess. We will not teach you ‘how to draw’ but rather aim to enable you to fully engage with and realise your own creative potential, build up confidence in your own artistic identity and think like an artist.”

I particularly like the encouragement to work with “the skills you already possess.” and the “we will not teach you, how to draw” heavens no that would be terrible. The results of the sessions are here so you can judge for yourself. St Martins Drawings there are some efforts that look like the student has potential, but knowing current art teaching they would have been told to loosen up and draw worse! One cannot help but notice that the model is lit by a single light plonked behind her. Which to my mind speaks of a monumental insensitivity to the visual world. You would not catch a photographer trying to capture the human form in that uncaring way.

I digress, but only to show that skill is very much not part of drawing to the contemporary mind. Nor is representation of the external. So what are we left with. The last line of the prospectus gives a clue. “realise your own creative potential” but leaves us puzzled as we are being allowed no tools whereby that might occur. You would not tell a music student “We won’t tell you how to play a musical instrument, here’s a room full of stuff with a few musical instruments thrown in, just give them a go and seek your own personal music.”

How does this connect with the “spiritual” I am not using it in the religious way, but in the way that people refer to things having indefinable qualities. We use (or misuse) the word “energy” in a similar way. Great artists are meant to imbued with an unparalleled access to this force, after all it couldn’t just be practice and hard work could it? I hinted online that maybe Michelangelo had his off days too… I was completely unprepared by the reaction. I was told that such a thought was absurd and only a jealous no hoper would demean the greatest of drawers. In reality I admire Michelangelo hugely, so it felt odd that they thought I disliked him. The problem of course was that I had said that an official beatified saint of drawing was a mortal and like us all occasionally had feet of clay.

Once again I refer to the excellent St Martins prospectus. “you will be encouraged to loose your inhibitions.” and later “build up confidence” now here I agree confidence is key. You do not however gain confidence by loosing your inhibitions. You increase confidence by becoming increased in your capabilities and you gain capabilities through study, practice and hard work. Many of the “inhibitions” can be due to lack of skill!

Later they refer to the “artistic potential” here at last we are getting to the heart of the matter. What is this thing that is assumed to be there, this “potential” ? Does it lie within us like a curled up flower within a bud just waiting for the clouds of inhibition to be swept away in order to unfurl in its glory? Why that is astounding! How wonderful, it means that somewhere  in my head must be a great novel, a stirring symphony fully formed just waiting to be released.

Of course this is absurd, but we very much like the idea. We so much want to be more than this fleshly robe. We want soul, we want an animating spirit, we don’t want biology and physics. We want art to flow from us like a river, we want to mine our inner selves for buried treasures. We do not want to dig foundations and build up brick by tedious brick until we have a house that has beauty but also all the signs of our own frailty.

I’d better give you some pictures after that lot… a few life paintings will be tagged on at the end in order to fully demonstrate that my own feet are well weighted with clay!

.

Greenwich, watercolour, plein air, painting

A well known view. I did it in three sessions, the first a plein air drawing with a couple of washes. I had to stop as I was a little too late in getting there

and I am taking a little more time to draw of late as well. Once home I established the basic tonality from reference but returned next evening to finish.

1/4 sheet Watercolour.

.

Croom's Hill, Greenwich, watercolour

This is Croom’s Hill leading down to Greenwich. At last the autumn colours are showing. I have found this wonderful colour in the Daniel Smiths range

called Zoicite that is a murky green with wonderful granulating properties. Quite tricky to use but adds interest and texture to greens.

.

Self portrait, Rob Adams, oil painting

Here is a rare beast, a self portrait! I was preparing to lop my hair off one evening when I was taken by my rather wild appearance

in the mirror. So barbering had to be delayed while I painted. I managed after a fair amount of buggering about and cursing to get a half decent

photo to finish it from. Always good to assess the damage that life is doing to your face. 12in by 10in Oils

.

Greenwich, London, plein air, oil painting

I did a drawing buildings tutorial with two friends, and managed to fit this sketch in as they wrestled with the horrors of architecture. this is part of the

Maritime Museum in Greenwich. 8in by 10in oils.

.

Greenwich, Thames, plein air, river, oil painting

On my way back to the car a storm was coming in, I just couldn’t resist trying to catch the drama. I had to lash my tripod to the railings! It is so easy

to just walk by these opportunities. Thames at Greenwich. 6in by 12in oils.

.

Life drawing, nude, watercolour

7min.

Life drawing, nude, figure, watercolour

5min

.

Life drawing

two 7min

.

Life Drawing, nude, watercolour

7min, was pleased with this one, every now and again you catch something in the quick sketches.

I nearly always prefer them to the longer paintings.

.

Nude, Life drawing, watercolour

7min. Esther is a fantastic model who takes up some very challenging poses!

.

nude, live drawing

Another wonderful model Alice. Here’s one where the feet of clay are very much in evidence, lovely pose, great lighting but the drawing was too far out.

30min.

.

life drawing, nude

Alice again. A bit better here despite not doing an initial drawing but just diving in with the paint. 30min.

.

Life drawing, nude, watercolour

Another one with no initial drawing. Flat on poses are the some of the hardest. I was painting here on hot pressed

Arches with flat sables. In fact the whole painting was done with a half inch brush!

30min.

.

Life drawing, nude, watercolour

The best one of the session with Esther I had a little longer at 45 min.

October 10, 2013

Choosing for Exhibitions

Filed under: London,Painting,Uncategorized,Watercolour — Tags: , , , , , , , , — Rob Adams @ 7:28 pm

There is a rash of open exhibitions to enter in the next few months and I have to decide what to put in. Oddly it is something I dread… I put the ones I think might fit the bill in a row and agonise over which is the most appropriate. This is especially hard for the open exhibitions run by the various societies. The New English will want something different from the ROI and RBA. Some are easier the RSMA want marine subjects so that narrows it down. The New English which is coming up is a difficult one. I start by looking at the members work. This gives you some idea at least. The NEAC fortunately has a decent selection on line to peruse. The work is pretty wide ranging from landscapes to figure work from some well known artists. I try and imagine what of mine would sit well amongst them. I have quite a few life paintings mostly in watercolour so I will try one of them.  Most of my work is cityscape and landscape so the other two have to be drawn from there. There are not many watercolours in the members work so it has to be oils. The trouble here is what I think is a good painting will not necessarily do well when briefly glanced at by a panel… especially at the end of a long day. I have one painting I reckon is interesting and a bit quirky but it is in sombre tones so designed for a close up look. Something that it will likely not get. Also anything in subtle close tones is unlikely to get attention, or indeed in muted colours. Once I have put the pictures that might fit in a row I usually have a crisis of confidence. Pictures get removed from the line and others substituted.

Last year I put in what by my lights were six of my best watercolours from the last year or so into the digital entry for the RI. Not one single one made it through. Yet when I went to the exhibition with the best will in the world I could not see why not. Looking at the successful entries from non members I did my very best to see why the ones chosen had been decided to have merit. Quite a few indeed most I could make a half decent case for, but quite a few others seemingly had few qualities of either skill or expression. This has made me rather suspicious of the digital entry method and I won’t go that route again. I suspect they are skimmed through in a very casual manner. We will see if getting the real thing before the jury has a better result. It is quite hard to write on this subject without sounding like sour grapes, but I have the feeling that the process of selection in some cases is not all it could be, especially on the digital entry.

I have got into the RSMA as I mentioned before, and also into the last 50 for the artist of the year for Artist and Illustrator magazine. This was a bit of a surprise as I put two pictures in a rush at the last minute as I had forgotten the cut off date.

The ROI is another tricky one. I need to put in studio pictures which are a bit thin on the ground this year. The subject matter is represented in the current membership with some good paintings. Is it a disadvantage that mine fit the same genre? I have no idea! The RBA is an odd one much more variety, probably a lower overall standard, but that is hardly surprising as it has a larger membership. Another thing I ponder is whether it is worth joining any of these institutions. Looking at the average age of members in all of them I do wonder how they will survive. It will take three or four years to join any of them at least no matter how good the work. Three years of getting pictures in the open shows is a requirement for most, which I would feel is a pretty poor guide as to a painter is good or not. So by the time I could apply I would be quite ancient myself! I do wonder why they are seemingly not proactive in seeking out talented artists to join. There are very many excellent painters who are not a member of any of these institutions which would perhaps not have been the case a 100 years ago.

They are sadly the very last remnants of organisations for skill based painting and even they are under attack from the Serota tendency. Year by year the level of excellence falls, no more is this true in watercolour where the RWS is quite happy to exhibit random splashes and the once very grand Royal Institute that had its own huge building in Piccadilly, is missing many of the really good practitioners from its ranks. Not that both organisations don’t have some very fine painters, but you would think they would be a bit more keen on getting an overall higher standard of membership. The days are gone when painters were desperate to get membership and those letters after your name really meant something. They do not even seem to do much of a job in promoting their craft. I hope I am wrong but I fear it is inevitable that they will fade away as their relevance decreases. It is such a pity as observational skill based painting has never needed organisations to bat on their side more.

Well hot off the press all my paintings for the New English Art Club were rejected, which means I got it wrong yet again. I will try the ROI and the RI, but if no luck I may give up on the Mall shows as they are not, I am starting to feel, really worth the bother. I was told by others that they were somewhat of a lottery, but didn’t altogether believe it. I suspect they were right and I have been wasting time and effort better spent else where. It is such a pity that it is almost impossible to find venues to show your work other than online. With all paintings the online image is quite poor compared to the real thing so only a part of what you strive for is ever seen. My own fault of course for being wedded to a moribund area of an almost dead art!

.

Green Park, Brass Monkeys, plein air, oil painting, Buckingham Palace

Brass Monkey season is with us again. Our first outing to Green Park. The forecast was poor but as so often happens the actual day was very paintable.

I loved the wet paths and the soft light. There was a constant stream of people crossing the park to work, too early for the tourists. 10in by 16in. Oils.

.

Green Park, Plein air, London, Brass Monkeys, oil painting

A very quick sketch I love this corner of Green Park but not quite found the composition I want. This is nearer but in the evening the light should be better

lighting up the famous Ritz Hotel. 8in by 10in Oils.

.

Shepherd Market, London, Plein air, Brass Monkeys

Last one, this is Shepherd Market. Quite a quick sketch so rather crude but I think there is a studio picture here somewhere.

14in by 10in Oils.

.

Deptford, London, Watercolour, Painting, Brookmill Rd

I’ve painted this view in Deptford quite a few times as it is right outside my door which makes it easier to catch in good light. It is a very ordinary road

but has a way of looking totally different depending on the day. I love the changing human activity as well. This is very early in the morning. It’s great to

do a few studio watercolours as the studio process of thinking things through makes effects possible that would be very hard en plein air.

1/2 Sheet Arches Rough.

.

Carlton House terrace, London, watercolour

Here is a plein air for comparison. What you loose in control you often gain in freshness. The other price is that plein air

produces a much higher proportion of waste paper! This one was a bit of a struggle as the paper would not dry then the sun

unexpectedly came full out and changed the scene so much I had to stop. I was mostly done so only 5min tinkering got it

finished. It is Carlton House Terrace near the back of the Mall Galleries.

.

Mall, watercolour, London, motorbike, st james Park

Another studio painting, I risked my life to get the photo as the traffic accelerates like the beginning of a motor race when the lights change! Quite wide

as I am using paper off a roll at present. Sooner or later I must try some seriously big paintings… This is the Mall of course, so all the paintings have a

Mayfair feeling in this post. 8in by 19in Watercolour on Arches rough.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress

error: Content is protected !!